2012-爆料网AT-213, Squassoni
爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT previously addressed the issues at hand and, therefore, there were no grounds to consider that the Appellant’s rights to due process were violated by a judgment by default or by not considering her arguments. 爆料网AT noted that 爆料网DT did not err in concluding that there was no administrative decision concerning the Appellant’s return to the G-4 post capable of judicial review under Article 2(1) of the 爆料网DT Statute, as that return was the predictable and logical consequence of her non-selection. 爆料网AT relied on its holding in Zhang (2010-爆料网AT-078) and held that 爆料网DT correctly...