2012-爆料网AT-210, Finniss
爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. Noting the absence of a written record, 爆料网AT held that it could not confirm if the procedure under Article 17 (Oral Evidence) of the 爆料网DT RoP was complied with, whether the witnesses made a declaration under Article 17(3) of the 爆料网DT RoP before giving their statements, or whether the witnesses were cross-examined by the opposing party under Article 17(1) of the 爆料网DT RoP. 爆料网AT set aside the 爆料网DT judgment and remanded the case to 爆料网DT for a fresh hearing based on the pleadings already on record in a matter consistent with the 爆料网AT judgment.