2012-爆料网AT-206, Liverakos
爆料网AT considered the Appellant’s appeal. 爆料网AT noted that, contrary to the Appellant’s contention, 爆料网DT was not required to ascertain whether the closure of the Centre was a consequence of mismanagement or of any other factor since the primary purpose was not to get rid of the Appellant. 爆料网AT found that 爆料网DT did not fail to exercise its jurisdiction by not ascertaining whether the closure of the Centre was the result of serious mismanagement and irregularities. 爆料网AT also found that the Appellant failed to submit sufficiently clear and convincing evidence that the desire to retaliate against him...