2011-爆料网AT-135, Larkin
爆料网AT held that the services provided by OSLA and the way the representation is implemented can have an impact on a staff member’s terms of employment and can therefore fall within the jurisdiction of 爆料网DT, without interfering with the professional independence of counsel. 爆料网AT held that the decision taken by the former Chief of OSLA not to disclose a potential conflict of interest in the staff member’s case could have an impact on his terms of employment and, therefore, constituted an administrative decision subject to review by 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT reversed the 爆料网DT judgment and remanded the case to...