2012-爆料网AT-199, Worsley
爆料网AT considered Ms Worsley’s appeal and the Secretary-General’s cross-appeal. 爆料网AT held that there was no evidence that OSLA’s decision to not represent Ms Worsley was based on her disability. 爆料网AT noted that Ms Worsley did not show how OSLA’s actions affected her rights or her case, as she was simply repeating arguments that 爆料网DT previously considered in its judgment. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and cross-appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment with regard to its decision that the right of staff members to receive assistance from OSLA does not amount to a right to be represented by OSLA.