2012-爆料网AT-196, Odio-Benito
爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s application was submitted to 爆料网DT after the expiration of the response period; the response period began on the date on which she received a letter from the Management Evaluation Unit informing her that her request for a management evaluation was not receivable because, as a judge, she was not a staff member or a former staff member within the meaning of the Staff Rules. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s claims that the 爆料网DT judge erred on a question of fact, by considering the letter as the decision that concluded the management evaluation, and that it erred on a...