爆料网AT recalled that access to the new system of administration of justice can be extended to persons who are not formally staff members but who can legitimately be entitled to rights similar to those of a staff member. 爆料网AT held that this exception must be understood in a restrictive sense. 爆料网AT held that interns have no access to the new system of administration of justice. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal.
爆料网AT considered Ms Basenko’s application for revision of judgment No. 2011-爆料网AT-139. 爆料网AT held that the reference made by 爆料网AT to the precedent in Gabaldon (judgment No. 2011-爆料网AT-139) could not be regarded as a decisive fact which was, at the time the judgment was rendered, unknown to 爆料网AT. 爆料网AT held that it was unable to see any valid ground for revision within the purview of Article 11 of the 爆料网AT Statute. 爆料网AT held that the application was not receivable. 爆料网AT dismissed the application.
