2010-爆料网AT-033, Mebtouche
爆料网AT preliminarily rejected the Appellant’s request for an oral hearing via teleconference, noting that his brief of appeal was sufficient and did not require further clarification. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s contention that 爆料网DT failed to consider his arguments regarding the former service on a “specialist” post was without merit, noting that this issue was considered by 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT noted that neither 爆料网DT nor 爆料网AT has the authority to amend any regulation or rule of the Organisation, so as to apply the “case by case” consideration to “specialist” staff members during promotion sessions to...