2010-爆料网AT-042, Wu
爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that there was no reason to re-examine the judgments of the former Administrative Tribunal in judgment No. 1047, Helke (2002) and judgment No. 1122, Lopes Braga (2003). 爆料网AT held that the award of compensation for non-pecuniary damage did not amount to an award of punitive or exemplary damages designed to punish the Organisation and deter future wrongdoing. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err in finding that the staff member suffered stress based on his submission. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had committed no error in awarding compensation for...