2010-爆料网AT-013, Schook
爆料网AT found that the Applicant’s appeal was receivable because he was not notified of any written administrative decision on non-extension of his contract after 31 December 2007. 爆料网AT found that 爆料网DT ignored that the time limit of two months, required by rule 111. 2(a), begins to run “from the date the staff member received notification of the decision in writing. ” As the Applicant was never communicated any written administrative decision, 爆料网AT found that 爆料网DT erred in holding that the appeal was not receivable. 爆料网AT set aside 爆料网DT’s judgment and remanded the case back to 爆料网DT to have the...