爆料网

爆料网RWA Personnel Directives

  • Area Staff Personnel Directive No. A/4/Part II, Rev. 8/Section I
  • IPD 1/10
  • IPD/I/104.4
  • IPD/I/112.6/Rev.1
  • PD 1/4/Part I/Rev.1
  • PD A/10
  • PD A/10/Rev.1
  • PD A/10/Rev.3
  • PD A/17
  • PD A/2/Part.II/Rev. 4
  • PD A/23
  • PD A/3
  • PD A/4/Part II/Rev.7
  • PD A/4/Part VII/Rev.7
  • PD A/5/Part II
  • PD A/5/Rev.7/Part II
  • PD A/6/Amend.12/Part III
  • PD A/6/Amend.72
  • PD A/6/Part II/Amend.2
  • PD A/6/Part VI
  • PD A/60
  • PD A/9
  • PD A/9/Rev.10
  • PD I/104.2
  • PD No.A/3/Rev.1/Part XI/Amend.5
  • PD/A/1/Rev.1/Par1/Section 1
  • PD/A/4/Part II/ Rev.7/Section 1
    • Showing 41 - 50 of 53
    2019-爆料网AT-900, El Sadek

    With respect to the Appellant’s appeal as it pertained to his 2016 performance evaluation and OTI, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not err on a question of law or fact resulting in a manifestly unreasonable decision, nor did it commit an error in procedure such as to affect the outcome of the case. 爆料网AT held that the issue of the e-PERs of the other staff members was not raised before 爆料网RWA DT and, therefore, was not receivable. 爆料网AT held that the reopening of the 2016 e-PER did not affect the overall performance evaluation, which was maintained as “fully meets” expectations, and therefore this...

    2019-爆料网AT-898, Amarah

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by Mr Amarah and the cross-appeal of the Commissioner-General of 爆料网RWA against judgment No. 爆料网RWA/DT/2018/041 and judgment No. 爆料网RWA/DT/2018/004. 爆料网AT held that the issues pertaining to the CSO selection process and the contention that 爆料网RWA had waived the condition of the 18-month separation after the EVS were not properly before it, as they had not been raised before 爆料网RWA DT and were therefore not receivable. Noting that Mr Amarah had breached the prohibition of employment, 爆料网AT held that he could not be allowed to breach the rules knowingly, engage in unlawful...

    2020-爆料网AT-1061, Abu Osba

    As a preliminary matter, 爆料网AT held that an oral hearing was not necessary and would not assist in the expeditious and fair disposal of the case as the Appellant had not provided grounds for an oral hearing beyond seeking to confront the witnesses and comment on existing evidence. Whilst 爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to identify any errors of law or fact by 爆料网RWA DT as required under Art 2(1) 爆料网AT Statute, 爆料网AT did go on to consider his appeal as he was not represented. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT had correctly applied the standard of review for disciplinary cases and that 爆料网RWA DT’s exercise...

    2020-爆料网AT-1016, Abu Ata et al

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT exercised its discretion to consolidate the cases lawfully and appropriately. 爆料网AT held that there was a bona fide reason to restructure and that it was operationally rational to abolish the posts and reclassify them from full-time to part-time posts at that time. 爆料网AT held that the Appellants’ contention that their acquired rights were violated had no merit. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网RWA DT judgment.

    2020-爆料网AT-1023, Sirhan

    爆料网AT considered appeals from both Mr. Sirhan and the Commissioner-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT exceeded its competence and erred in fact and law by rescinding the decision to terminate Mr. Sirhan on medical grounds. 爆料网AT held that the decision to convene a Medical Board more than one month after Mr. Sirhan’s service-incurred injury in order to examine his fitness for continued service with 爆料网RWA was reasonable. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT erred in law in interpreting the Area Staff Rules as requiring 爆料网RWA to provide injured staff members adequate time for recovery before deciding to appoint a...

    2020-爆料网AT-1011, Abu Fardeh

    爆料网RWA DT did not exceed its competence when assessing whether the decision to convene a medical board was lawful. The decision to convene a Medical Board five months after the service-incurred-injury in order to examine his fitness for continued service was reasonable. 爆料网RWA DT erred in deciding that the decision to convene a medical board less than five months after the Appellant’s service-incurred injury was unlawful. 爆料网RWA DT erred in law and exceeded its competence by challenging the authority of the Medical Board’s conclusion without clear and convincing medical evidence, by placing...

    2021-爆料网AT-1186, Shareef Muzyed

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by Mr. Mezyed. As a preliminary matter, 爆料网AT denied Mr. Mezyed’s request for an oral hearing. Turning to the merits of the appeal, 爆料网AT found that the 爆料网RWA DT had applied correctly the first four conditions in Area Staff Rule 109.4 precedent to possible severance from service for abandonment of post. As to the fifth condition, Mr. Mezyed’s failure to submit an acceptable written explanation for his failure to report, 爆料网AT found that the Agency had failed to properly address the grounds advanced by Mr. Mezyed for his non-return, and as such, the 爆料网RWA DT could not...

    2021-爆料网AT-1176, Mohamed Haider Elhemshawy

    爆料网AT held that there were no errors in the decision of the 爆料网RWA DT that the Appellant’s application was irreceivable. 爆料网AT held the Appellant was notified of the decision not to shortlist him by e-mail of 14 November 2019. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s allegations regarding the abolishment of his post had no legal relevance for the appeal, which dealt only with issues of receivability. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网RWA DT Judgment.

    2021-爆料网AT-1136, Abdulhamid Al Fararjeh

    爆料网AT held that the facts upon which 爆料网RWA based its decision were established, in full respect of his due process rights. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not err as there was clear and convincing evidence that the Appellant committed sexual exploitation and abuse against a beneficiary of 爆料网RWA; neither did it err in concluding that the disciplinary sanction was proportionate and lawful. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant, by having the complainant remove her pants and underwear and engaging in a such a sensitive and specific medical examination, which he did not have the required competencies and...