爆料网

爆料网RWA Area Staff Rules

  • 111.2(3)
  • 111.2(3)b
  • Appendix to the Staff Rules 1-D/E effective 2015 (Salary Scale Gaza and West Bank)
  • Former Rule 106.1(16)
  • Former Rule 111.3
  • Former Rule 111.3(2)
  • Former Rule 111.3(4)
  • Rule 103.3
  • Rule 103.5
  • Rule 103.8.1
  • Rule 104.4
  • Rule 105.2
  • Rule 106.1(16)(D)(ii)
  • Rule 106.2
  • Rule 106.2(7)
  • Rule 106.2(9)
  • Rule 106.3
  • Rule 106.3.1
  • Rule 106.4
  • Rule 106.4(8)
  • Rule 107.9
  • Rule 109.1
  • Rule 109.2
  • Rule 109.2(5)
  • Rule 109.2(7)
  • Rule 109.4
  • Rule 109.4(2)
  • Rule 109.4(3)
  • Rule 109.5
  • Rule 109.7
  • Rule 109.7(7)
  • Rule 109.9(3)
  • Rule 110.1
  • Rule 110.2
  • Rule 110.3
  • Rule 111.1
  • Rule 111.2
  • Rule 111.2(1)
  • Rule 111.3
  • Rule 111.3(4)
  • Rule 111.4
  • Rule 112.3(D)
  • Rule 113.1
  • 爆料网RWA Staff Rule 111.2(5)
    • Showing 31 - 40 of 91
    2022-爆料网AT-1194, Jafar Hilmi Wakid

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not commit an error in procedure, such as to affect the decision of the case pursuant to Article 2(1) of the 爆料网AT Statute. 爆料网AT rejected the argument that the fact that the Appellant did not receive the recordings of the hearing or transcript affected the decision of the case. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant merely repeated arguments raised before 爆料网RWA DT. 爆料网AT accepted 爆料网RWA DT’s finding that the Appellant had ample opportunity to respond to allegations and provide comments on the investigation report and exhibits. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT made fundamental errors of...

    2019-爆料网AT-927, Jafari

    爆料网AT agreed with 爆料网RWA DT that the legal framework did not establish an automatic right of the staff member to the extension of his or her service beyond the age of retirement upon the submission of the pertinent application, even if she or he satisfied those two conditions. However, 爆料网AT held that, contrary to 爆料网RWA DT’s finding, the Administration has the discretion to deny a request to extend a staff member’s service beyond retirement only in exceptional cases and on account of the interests of 爆料网RWA, which must be reflected clearly and precisely in the reasoning for the decision. 爆料网AT held...

    2010-爆料网AT-069, Ibrahim

    爆料网AT considered an appeal centred on the receivability of the appeal to the JAB. The Appellant had sought a waiver of the time limit to appeal before JAB on the basis that his legal counsel was away from Syria for medical treatment for a year. 爆料网AT held that there were no exceptional circumstances to justify the Appellant’s 18-month delay in filing his appeal pending either his counsel’s return or replacement. 爆料网AT held that the JAB properly considered that there were no exceptional circumstances justifying a waiver of the time limit to file an appeal to the JAB. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and...

    2010-爆料网AT-039, Maghari

    爆料网AT considered whether the Commissioner-General erred in adopting the JAB’s recommendation not to accept the Appellant’s withdrawal letter and whether the Appellant was entitled to compensation for moral and material damages. 爆料网AT referred to Jordan Field Staff Circular No. J/17/97, which provides that withdrawal of resignations will normally not be accepted unless it is evident that such withdrawal is in the sole interest of the work. 爆料网AT noted that the evidence on record revealed that the Appellant’s services were unsatisfactory. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant provided no evidence of...

    2010-爆料网AT-025, Doleh

    爆料网AT preliminarily held that the appeal was receivable, as it was filed within the time granted for re-filing. With regards to the issue of the Appellant’s termination, 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网RWA JAB’s decision was legal, rational, and procedurally proper. 爆料网AT held that it was an exceptional case where the doctrine of proportionality should be invoked. 爆料网AT held that the decision to terminate the Appellant’s services was disproportionate, more drastic than necessary. 爆料网AT noted that the changes in the records that were made by the Appellant showed that she had originally not reflected that the...

    2010-爆料网AT-022, Abu Hamda

    爆料网AT noted that, when reviewing a sanction imposed by the Administration, it needed to examine whether the facts on which the sanction was based were established; whether the established facts legally amounted to misconduct; and whether the disciplinary measure applied was disproportionate to the offense. 爆料网AT affirmed the Commissioner-General’s decision to discipline the staff member for misconduct. However, in light of the mitigating factors, 爆料网AT held that the disciplinary measure was disproportionate to the offense and substituted the disciplinary measure of demotion with that of a written...

    2012-爆料网AT-269, Hamad

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT was correct in applying Former 爆料网RWA Area Staff Rule 106. 1. 16 to calculate the interest applicable to the Appellant’s pay-out and that 爆料网RWA DT had not erred in this regard. 爆料网AT held that the contention that the Administrative Rules of the United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund apply to the Appellant’s situation had no merit and had been raised for the first time on appeal. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to demonstrate that 爆料网RWA DT had erred in finding that the Appellant’s terms and conditions of employment are governed solely and exclusively by the Agency...

    2013-爆料网AT-369, Darwish

    爆料网AT affirmed the 爆料网RWA DT decision that the application was not receivable as consistent with 爆料网RWA Area Staff Rule 111. 2 and Article 8 of the 爆料网RWA DT Statute. On alleged errors in procedure, 爆料网AT noted that the Appellant had no opportunity to challenge the untimeliness of the Commissioner-General’s reply before 爆料网RWA DT, but that, since the Appellant had not demonstrated how the untimely reply affected 爆料网RWA DT’s decision on receivability, 爆料网AT found no merit on this ground. 爆料网AT held that there was no error in 爆料网RWA DT’s reasoning on the issue of EVR. 爆料网AT held that, absent an appealable...

    2013-爆料网AT-363, Chaaban

    爆料网AT held there was no error in the 爆料网RWA DT’s finding that the application was time-barred. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT has, in principle, the discretion to accept 爆料网RWA’s late reply in circumstances where 爆料网RWA has not filed a motion seeking leave to do so and without proprio motu ordering 爆料网RWA to file a reply. Noting the Administration’s reply was due before the transitional period into the new system of justice began, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT erred when it granted a waiver of time after an excessive period of time had passed which was based on inaccurate facts and an invalid reason. 爆料网AT held...