±¬ÁÏÍø

The ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that the ±¬ÁÏÍøRWA DT did not err in finding that the former staff member¡¯s application was not receivable ratione materiae.The ±¬ÁÏÍøAT found that DIOS had no decision-making authority in addressing the substance of his complaint of retaliation and that it undertook its investigation merely as a step in the investigative process that did not amount to a reviewable administrative decision.

Similarly, the ±¬ÁÏÍøAT found that the Ethics Office¡¯s determination that it had not been established that retaliation had occurred, and its subsequent closure of the file without further investigation...

The ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that the ±¬ÁÏÍøRWA DT did not err in finding that the decision to close the investigation into the former staff member¡¯s complaint was lawful.It found that the account of the incident in which B allegedly rubbed against her presented an equivocal case of sexual harassment, and that it was therefore open to the investigator and to the decision-maker to conclude that the case was of insufficient strength to pursue against B.The ±¬ÁÏÍøAT further found that the two other incidents invoked by the former staff member ¨C B allegedly walking to her side in a corridor and offering her to drink...

The ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that the ±¬ÁÏÍøRWA Dispute Tribunal did not err in concluding that the former staff member¡¯s claim regarding the calculation of Provident Fund benefits was unfounded because the Agency correctly applied the governing legal framework. The ±¬ÁÏÍøAT found that, under Area Staff Rule 106.1(16)(D)(ii), the last published special interest rate applies up to and including the month immediately preceding payment. Since the payment was made in August 2022, the Agency properly applied PF Secretariat Circular PFS/08/2022, which declared a negative special interest rate of -15.18% for January¨CJune...

The ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that the ±¬ÁÏÍøRWA Dispute Tribunal did not err in concluding that the former staff member¡¯s claim regarding the calculation of Provident Fund benefits was unfounded because the Agency correctly applied the governing legal framework. The ±¬ÁÏÍøAT found that, under Area Staff Rule 106.1(16)(D)(ii), the last published special interest rate applies up to and including the month immediately preceding payment. Since the payment was made in August 2022, the Agency properly applied PF Secretariat Circular PFS/08/2022, which declared a negative special interest rate of -15.18% for January¨CJune...

The ±¬ÁÏÍøAT found that Mr. Slayyeh did not file a proper appeal of the impugned Judgment but rather was bringing a new claim for compensation that had not been submitted to the Dispute Tribunal. The ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that he could not introduce on appeal an issue not previously presented to the first instance tribunal as it is a violation of the due process rights of the other party and does not comply with the two-tier system of administration of justice.

The ±¬ÁÏÍøAT found that the remedies available under Article 10(5) of the ±¬ÁÏÍøRWA DT Statute allow the ±¬ÁÏÍøRWA DT to rescind the contested decision or order...

The ±¬ÁÏÍøAT upheld the ±¬ÁÏÍøRWA DT¡¯s determination of the former staff member¡¯s chances of selection for the position at one-fourth on alternative grounds. The ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that the ±¬ÁÏÍøRWA DT appropriately considered the possibility that the Agency could have introduced additional candidates on an equivalency basis during a second review after the shortlisting phase. In particular, the ±¬ÁÏÍøRWA DT held that, since the sufficient number of candidates for a competitive exercise was normally between three to five candidates per vacancy, it was reasonable to expect that the Agency would have brought more...

The ±¬ÁÏÍøAT noted that before the applicant became a staff member, he had been employed by ±¬ÁÏÍøRWA as complementary personnel with non-staff status and was not entitled to any benefit beyond what had been established for daily-paid workers. The ±¬ÁÏÍøAT observed that neither his daily-paid service contracts nor a sample of daily-paid service contracts applicable at the relevant time mentioned payment of any compensation upon expiration.

The ±¬ÁÏÍøAT found that upon each expiry of the applicant¡¯s daily-paid service contract, it was successively renewed and he was bound by the Agency¡¯s regulations and...

The ±¬ÁÏÍøAT decided that mistakes in the way the summary dismissal decision was communicated to the appellant did not affect the fact that the real decision had ultimately been taken by the competent person in the Commissioner-General and not by any delegated authority.

It was undisputed that Mr. Mohammad was not afforded the opportunity to comment on the additional evidence produced against him after the re-opening of the investigation (two interviews of student B¡¯s mother and student B). However, neither in his appeal nor in his initial application to the ±¬ÁÏÍøRWA DT did he point out any...

The ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that the Appellant has failed to discharge her burden and has not demonstrated that the ±¬ÁÏÍøRWA DT committed any of the errors outlined in Article 2(1) of the ±¬ÁÏÍøAT Statute. It concluded that the Appellant relitigated arguments that failed before the ±¬ÁÏÍøRWA Dispute Tribunal and expressed her general disagreement with the impugned Judgment.

The ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that the contested decision was a valid and lawful exercise of the Agency¡¯s discretion. It found that the Agency reviewed and considered the Appellant¡¯s request for telecommuting in accordance with the legal framework, i.e. Area...

±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that ±¬ÁÏÍøRWA DT did not commit an error in procedure, such as to affect the decision of the case pursuant to Article 2(1) of the ±¬ÁÏÍøAT Statute. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT rejected the argument that the fact that the Appellant did not receive the recordings of the hearing or transcript affected the decision of the case. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that the Appellant merely repeated arguments raised before ±¬ÁÏÍøRWA DT. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT accepted ±¬ÁÏÍøRWA DT¡¯s finding that the Appellant had ample opportunity to respond to allegations and provide comments on the investigation report and exhibits. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that ±¬ÁÏÍøRWA DT made fundamental errors of...