爆料网

爆料网JSPF Regulations

  • Annex I
  • Annex IV
  • Annex ll
  • Article 1
  • Article 1(l)
  • Article 1(q)
  • Article 1(v)
  • Article 10
  • Article 13
  • Article 2
  • Article 22
  • Article 22(b)
  • Article 22(c)
  • Article 24
  • Article 24(a)
  • Article 25
  • Article 25(b)(i)
  • Article 27
  • Article 28
  • Article 28(d)
  • Article 29
  • Article 29(e)
  • Article 30
  • Article 30(b)
  • Article 31
  • Article 31 (b) (ii)
  • Article 31(a)
  • Article 31(b)(i)
  • Article 32
  • Article 32(a)
  • Article 32(b)
  • Article 33
  • Article 33(a)
  • Article 34
  • Article 35
  • Article 35(b)(i)
  • Article 35ter
  • Article 38
  • Article 4(b)
  • Article 4(c)
  • Article 40
  • Article 44
  • Article 45
  • Article 48
  • Article 48(a)
  • Article 49(b)
  • Article 50
  • Article 50(b)
  • Article 53
  • Article 54
  • Article 6
  • Article 6(a)
  • Former Regulation 31
  • Former Regulation 35
  • Regulation 1(n)
  • Regulation 30(a)
  • Section H.5
  • Section K
  • Section K.1
  • Section K.5
  • Section K.8(a)
  • Section K.8(b)
    • Showing 11 - 20 of 77
    2023-爆料网AT-1365, Polycarp Ambe-Niba

    The 爆料网AT considered an appeal by the participant in the Fund.

    The 爆料网AT found that the facts suggest that the participant’s withdrawal settlement funds were paid into a bank account which had not been opened by him. At the same time, there were unanswered questions as to how the participant had bank statements and cancelled cheques from this account if he had not opened it. In addition, given the mismatch between the participant’s name and the name of the holder of the bank account, there was no explanation as to why the wire transfer had been allowed to proceed and had not been rejected.

    The...

    2022-爆料网AT-1295, Alejandro Arigon

    爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网JSPB decision.

    爆料网AT recalled that at the time of Mr. Arigon’s entry into participation in 2002, Article 24 did not allow him the option to restore his prior contributory service because that option was limited to participants whose previous period of contributory service was less than five years and who had received a withdrawal settlement; neither of which applied to him. When the 2007 amendment to Article 24 was introduced, he had a one-year window, from 1 April 2007 to 1 April 2008, during which he could elect to restore his prior period of...

    2022-爆料网AT-1193, Carolina Larriera

    Ms. Larriera sought revision of the 爆料网AT judgment on the grounds that new decisive facts had emerged from the French government regarding her relationship with the deceased participant of the 爆料网JSPF, Mr. M. Specifically, she maintains that the French government has endorsed the findings of a Brazilian court that she was in a “stable union” with Mr. M., and that this has also been annotated on the death certificate of Mr. M.

    爆料网AT observed that Ms. Larriera’s application for revision was untimely. In addition, 爆料网AT concluded that these allegedly decisive facts occurred in 2021, well after the...

    2022-爆料网AT-1277, Betty Mukomah

    The 爆料网AT considered an appeal by Ms. Mukomah.

    The 爆料网AT held that Ms. Mukomah’s submission that she was the spouse of the late participant at the time of his death and is therefore entitled on that basis to a widow’s benefit under Article 34 of the Fund’s Regulations, was not sustainable based on the evidence before the 爆料网AT.

    The 爆料网AT found that there was insufficient evidence proving that the late participant and Ms. Mukomah lawfully entered a (second) union legally recognized by the competent authority of Kenya conferring similar legal effects as a marriage in relation to pension rights...

    2023-爆料网AT-1326, Conforte Uwingabire Banyanga

    The 爆料网AT denied Ms. Banyanga’s appeal and affirmed the decision of the Standing Committee. The 爆料网AT found that Ms. Banyanga had not adequately explained the inconsistencies between her own personal information and the information submitted by Mr. Mbirange regarding his reported spouse (including that the name “Banyanga” did not appear in the documentation that Mr. Mbirange provided about his spouse).

    The 爆料网AT also rejected Ms. Banyanga’s reliance on the marriage certificate that she submitted, which showed a purported date of marriage in 1997. The 爆料网AT observed that Mr. Mbirange entered...

    2023-爆料网AT-1323, Elena Korotaeva

    The 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal.

    The 爆料网AT first held that the 爆料网DT erred in law in retroactively applying WMO Staff Rule 193.3(c) when it examined her right to a termination indemnity. At the time the impugned decision was taken, only the 2019 WMO Staff Regulations and Rules were in force and should have been applied. The 爆料网DT made an error in applying the 2020 law based on the Secretary-General’s submission of the wrong version of the WMO Regulations and Rules to the 爆料网DT.

    The 爆料网AT affirmed the 爆料网DT's finding that the Administration’s response to a request for management evaluation is not a...

    2023-爆料网AT-1321, Diana Kenoly, Carolyne Alany Rumah, Felix Kwame and Nicholas Kariuki Kinyanjui in respect of Roselyne Kayeke Oming (deceased)

    The 爆料网AT dismissed both the appeal and the cross-appeal.

    As to the Secretary-General's cross-appeal against the 爆料网DT's decision on receivability, the 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT was correct not to dismiss the claims as unreceivable, but to investigate their merits.

    Turning to the merits, the 爆料网AT noted that death benefits under the Rules are not payable to beneficiaries nominated by a staff member, but to designated beneficiaries as defined by the Staff Rules (i.e. the surviving spouse or dependent children). The 爆料网AT found that Mr. Oming survived Ms. Oming and the substantial preponderance of...

    2023-爆料网AT-1346, Angioli Rolli

    The 爆料网AT dismissed the Secretary-General’s appeal and granted Mr. Rolli’s cross-appeal in part. The 爆料网AT found that the rescission of the termination decision ordered by the 爆料网DT was “pointless” since by the time the case had reached the 爆料网DT, Mr. Rolli’s post had been abolished. The 爆料网AT accordingly held that in these circumstances, compensation had to fall under Article 10(5)(b) and be for harm caused by the unlawful decision. The harms he suffered included the loss of his remuneration and benefits (education and pension entitlements), the specific losses resulting of his ceasing to be...

    2023-爆料网AT-1343, Ann-Christin Raschdorf

    The 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal. The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT correctly found not receivable Ms. Raschdorf's application with respect to the non-renewal decision and the ABCC’s decision given Ms. Raschdorf's failure to request management evaluation. The 爆料网AT found that contrary to Ms. Raschdorf's contention, the non-renewal decision was not taken subsequent to advice from a technical body. As to the ABCC's decision on whether the claim was time-barred, the 爆料网AT found that that decision was not based on a consideration of a medical evaluation but was concerned with the timeliness of the...

    爆料网DT/2023/008, Piazzi

    Whether the Applicant had a right of return A Human Resources Factsheet, issued for Umoja users, provides that at the end of a loan period, the staff member concerned is expected to return to the Secretariat unless he/she resigns his/her Secretariat position to transfer to the receiving organization. Such practice has been clearly confirmed by the Appeals Tribunal in Iskandar (see Iskandar 2012-爆料网AT-248). Accordingly, while the Applicant’s lien on his former post may have been surrendered in accordance with the Administration’s decision of 9 September 2009, he retained a return right to OCHA...