爆料网

爆料网DT RoP

  • Article 10
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.2(a)
  • Article 11.2(c)
  • Article 12
  • Article 12.1
  • Article 13
  • Article 13.1
  • Article 13.2
  • Article 13.3
  • Article 13.4
  • Article 14
  • Article 14.1
  • Article 14.4
  • Article 15
  • Article 15.1
  • Article 15.13
  • Article 15.2
  • Article 15.3
  • Article 15.4
  • Article 15.5
  • Article 15.6
  • Article 15.7
  • Article 16
  • Article 16.1
  • Article 16.2
  • Article 16.3
  • Article 16.6
  • Article 17
  • Article 17.1
  • Article 17.2
  • Article 17.3
  • Article 17.5
  • Article 17.6
  • Article 17.6
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 18.2
  • Article 18.3
  • Article 18.4
  • Article 18.5
  • Article 19
  • Article 19.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 20
  • Article 21
  • Article 22
  • Article 24
  • Article 24.1
  • Article 24.2
  • Article 24.3
  • Article 25
  • Article 26
  • Article 26.2
  • Article 27
  • Article 27.1
  • Article 27.2
  • Article 27.2(c)
  • Article 28
  • Article 28.2
  • Article 29
  • Article 29.1
  • Article 29.2
  • Article 30
  • Article 31
  • Article 31.1
  • Article 32
  • Article 32.2
  • Article 34
  • Article 34(a)
  • Article 34(b)
  • Article 35
  • Article 36
  • Article 36.1
  • Article 4.7
  • Article 5.2
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(a)
  • Article 7.1(b)
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 7.6
  • Article 7(a)
  • Article 7(b)
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.2(c)
  • Article 8.2(e)
  • Article 8.2(g)
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 8.4
  • Article 8.6
  • Article 8(d)(i)
  • Article 9
    • Showing 91 - 100 of 671
    爆料网DT/2022/075, Stepanovic

    Where a staff member is challenging many different administrative decisions to be considered as a whole,with cumulative effect, there is no need to challenge them (by a management evaluation request and then application before the Tribunal) one by one.

    The Applicant alleged that he was deprived of his core functions in 2018 and 2019, that is more than two years before the application. He only requested management evaluation in April 2021 against a 2018 decision, and not towards the subsequent administrative decisions.

    Even if the Tribunal accepted that the last of the adverse decisions was...

    2023-爆料网AT-1351, Imran Ahmad Shah

    The main issue presented in this appeal was whether the 爆料网DT was correct to dismiss Mr. Shah’s application as not receivable ratione materiae because he was not challenging a final administrative decision. The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT correctly found that an interoffice memorandum that changed the reporting lines for all of the staff who worked on the India side of the United Nations Mission Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan (爆料网MOGIP) was not an appealable administrative decision because it did not deprive Mr. Shah of his work or affect his functions.

    The 爆料网AT also rejected Mr...

    2023-爆料网AT-1355, Ramesh Balakrishnan Menon

    The 爆料网AT denied the Appellant’s request for an oral hearing. It held that, pursuant to Article 18 of the Appeals Tribunal Rules of Procedure, an oral hearing would not be of any assistance in this case as the issue for consideration was straightforward and not complex.

    The 爆料网AT found that the Appellant’s attempt to broaden the scope of the issue for consideration was untenable. The 爆料网AT concluded that it was clearly agreed at the case management discussion (CMD) that the issue for determination was the desired reclassification of Mr. Menon's post from the P-4 to the P-5 level and that the...

    2023-爆料网AT-1366, AAN

    The 爆料网AT considered an appeal by the staff member.

    The 爆料网AT found that because of a combination of the staff member’s failure to recall the events in question and of the 爆料网DT’s decision (concurred in by the parties) not to hold an in-person hearing, the 爆料网DT had appropriately referred to the investigation report.

    The 爆料网AT was of the view that the 爆料网DT had correctly determined the staff member’s acts were sexual in nature. The staff member had, without invitation, encouragement or consent, embraced two different women in a sexual manner at a party at a staff retreat. The 爆料网AT held that the...

    2023-爆料网AT-1370, AAC

    After requesting additional findings of fact from the 爆料网DT, the 爆料网AT reconsidered an appeal by the staff member following the prior remand.

    The 爆料网AT found that the 爆料网DT’s judgment had failed to make a single mention of the nature, content or purpose of the testimony adduced under oath before it but was based entirely on hearsay evidence drawn exclusively from the investigation report and other documents. The 爆料网AT found problematic the fact that the 爆料网DT made no pronouncement as to why it exclusively relied on hearsay evidence and gave no reason why the evidence was not given by the person...

    2023-爆料网AT-1371, Enrico Muratore Aprosio

    The 爆料网AT denied the Appellant’s request for an oral hearing. It found that it would add nothing to his case presented in writing to hear from him in person and that an oral hearing would not assist in the expeditious and fair disposition of the case.

    The 爆料网AT held that much of the submissions advanced by the Appellant did amount to a resubmission of the case put to the 爆料网DT but which it did not accept.

    The 爆料网AT found that the WSSCC structure was closed down on 31 December 2020 at the instigation of its donors and replaced by another organisation (the Sanitation and Hygiene Fund). It...

    2022-爆料网AT-1202, Elmira Banaj

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by Ms. Banaj against Judgment No. 爆料网DT/2021/030.

    爆料网AT held that a reallocation of duties pending the outcome of an investigation as occurred in Ms. Banaj’s case is permissible as an interim measure in such circumstances, but not as the exercise of the general power of assignments available to the Secretary-General in Staff Regulation 1.2(c) […] But, under Staff Rule 10.4 and the Framework relating to interim measures pending an investigation and disciplinary process, there is an alternative measure of reallocation of duties available in such cases where the...

    2023-爆料网AT-1354, James Okwakol

    The 爆料网AT first dismissed Mr. Okwakol’s appeal of the 爆料网DT Order, finding that Mr. Okwakol’s complaints about what the 爆料网DT decided it would admit into evidence and what submissions it would consider in deciding his substantive case, were remediable as part of his appeal on the merits if they were wrongly decided.

    The 爆料网AT agreed that the 爆料网DT was correct to admit the audio-recording made by the SEA victim because this evidentiary material was relied upon by the Administration in taking the decision to impose the disciplinary measure of separation from service. The audio-recording needed to...

    2022-爆料网AT-1291, Korkut Yavuz

    爆料网AT upheld the 爆料网DT’s conclusion that the Administration’s decision not to set up a fact-finding investigation panel against Mr. Yavuz’s FRO and SRO was lawful, as the incidents described in Mr. Yavuz’s complaint did not provide sufficient grounds they had engaged in prohibited conduct (harassment, abuse of authority) but fell in the realm of workplace disagreements. 爆料网AT found that Mr. Yavuz did not show that the incidents mentioned in his complaint with regard to the conduct of his FRO and SRO were in any way motivated by any of the characteristics or traits (or similar) listed in Section 1...

    2023-爆料网AT-1360, Moner Ahmed Nasser

    The 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT exercised its discretion to proceed by summary judgment, without examining the merits of the case, lawfully and appropriately. It found that in this way, the 爆料网RWA DT acted not only in accordance with the principles of judicial economy and efficiency, but also in the interest of expeditious disposal of the case.

    The 爆料网AT found that the Appellant received the contested administrative decision on 3 November 2009 and filed his application with the 爆料网RWA DT on 12 August 2022. Therefore, it was obvious that he filed his application more than three years after his...