爆料网

爆料网DT RoP

  • Article 10
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.2(a)
  • Article 11.2(c)
  • Article 12
  • Article 12.1
  • Article 13
  • Article 13.1
  • Article 13.2
  • Article 13.3
  • Article 13.4
  • Article 14
  • Article 14.1
  • Article 14.4
  • Article 15
  • Article 15.1
  • Article 15.13
  • Article 15.2
  • Article 15.3
  • Article 15.4
  • Article 15.5
  • Article 15.6
  • Article 15.7
  • Article 16
  • Article 16.1
  • Article 16.2
  • Article 16.3
  • Article 16.6
  • Article 17
  • Article 17.1
  • Article 17.2
  • Article 17.3
  • Article 17.5
  • Article 17.6
  • Article 17.6
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 18.2
  • Article 18.3
  • Article 18.4
  • Article 18.5
  • Article 19
  • Article 19.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 20
  • Article 21
  • Article 22
  • Article 24
  • Article 24.1
  • Article 24.2
  • Article 24.3
  • Article 25
  • Article 26
  • Article 26.2
  • Article 27
  • Article 27.1
  • Article 27.2
  • Article 27.2(c)
  • Article 28
  • Article 28.2
  • Article 29
  • Article 29.1
  • Article 29.2
  • Article 30
  • Article 31
  • Article 31.1
  • Article 32
  • Article 32.2
  • Article 34
  • Article 34(a)
  • Article 34(b)
  • Article 35
  • Article 36
  • Article 36.1
  • Article 4.7
  • Article 5.2
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(a)
  • Article 7.1(b)
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 7.6
  • Article 7(a)
  • Article 7(b)
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.2(c)
  • Article 8.2(e)
  • Article 8.2(g)
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 8.4
  • Article 8.6
  • Article 8(d)(i)
  • Article 9
    • Showing 61 - 70 of 671
    爆料网DT/2024/047, Argyrou

    The Tribunal noted that the Applicant’s challenges/complaints did not derive from one clear administrative decision. The first challenge was addressed to an alleged failure by the Administration to fully comply with sec. 2.4 ST/AI/1998/9 (System for the classification of posts). The second one was based on the Applicant’s apparent assumption that he should have been upgraded/promoted to GS-7 level after the upward reclassification of the post he was encumbering.

    As a result, the Tribunal interpreted the application as a whole to determine exactly the starting point of the Applicant’s...

    2024-爆料网AT-1460, Al Waleed Abdelrahman Abdrabou

    The 爆料网AT noted that the 爆料网DT had appropriately relied on the clear and convincing evidence to conclude that the staff member had submitted a medical insurance claim to Cigna for medical services that had never been provided.

    The 爆料网AT held that the evidence established that it was highly probable that the staff member had made the misrepresentation to Cigna with the intent to deceive and that his actions had been potentially prejudicial to the 爆料网DP which was subject to any loss from undue reimbursements.

    The 爆料网AT found that the staff member’s certification to Cigna of the correctness of the...

    2024-爆料网AT-1456, Surendra Bista

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT erroneously concluded that there was clear and convincing evidence of the former staff member’s knowledge that he was in a prohibited family relationship with another staff member, Mr. S.R.B.

    Moreover, the 爆料网AT found that even if the information provided by the former staff member was false, he could not have intended to mislead the Organization by providing or omitting it. On the contrary, the evidence established that when he made his relevant applications, he did not know, and had no reason to know, that Mr. S.R.B. was employed by the United Nations. In...

    2024-爆料网AT-1452, Ousmane Tamba Dia

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT did not commit any error in procedure that affected the outcome of the case by partially denying the former staff member’s motions for production of additional evidence or by not granting him sufficient additional time to respond to the Secretary-General’s submissions.

    The 爆料网AT also concluded that the 爆料网DT appropriately identified the contested decision as the 1 April 2022 decision finding him ineligible to participate in ASHI. The 爆料网AT observed that the former staff member himself identified this decision in both his 爆料网DT application and his management evaluation...

    2024-爆料网AT-1449, Michael David Antoine

    The 爆料网AT noted that the staff member publicly engaged in acts of a sexual nature in a clearly marked United Nations vehicle, bringing disrepute to the Organization and difficulties with the host country.

    The 爆料网AT found that the case was not one where the issues required the 爆料网DT’s determination of the credibility of contradicting testimonies of parties or witnesses and the lack of a 爆料网DT hearing had not affected its decision. The 爆料网DT had before it a video clip depicting the actions in question, which were clearly of a sexual nature.

    The 爆料网AT agreed with the 爆料网DT that the lawfulness of the...

    2024-爆料网AT-1448, Ray Steven Millan

    The 爆料网AT noted that the staff member allowed an unauthorized female individual to board a United Nations vehicle assigned to him and to publicly commit acts of a sexual nature in the rear seat, bringing disrepute to the Organization and difficulties with the host country.

    The 爆料网AT found that the case was not one where the issues required the 爆料网DT’s determination of the credibility of contradicting testimonies of parties or witnesses and the lack of a 爆料网DT hearing had not affected its decision. The 爆料网DT appropriately considered the former staff member's admissions, as well as the video clip...

    2024-爆料网AT-1418, Paul Njoroge Ng'ang'a

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT acted within its discretion by issuing the impugned Judgment without holding an oral hearing, especially as the issue for consideration was one of receivability. The 爆料网AT also held that the 爆料网DT did not err in failing to give the staff member an opportunity to comment on the Secretary-General’s reply as he did not file a motion for additional pleadings.

    The 爆料网AT found that the 爆料网DT correctly identified that the contested decision was the Administration’s decision not to reclassify his position.

    The 爆料网AT held that the staff member should have appealed the...

    2024-爆料网AT-1419, Nicole Wynn

    The 爆料网AT noted that the Dispute Tribunal had issued the impugned Order granting the request to extend the time limit for filing the application without the adversely-affected party being heard and without authority to do so. The 爆料网AT found that the 爆料网DT had not technically complied with its own Practice Direction in issuing the Order and may have strictly violated the principles of natural justice and due process by failing to give the Secretary-General adequate notice of the motion and an opportunity to reply.

    The 爆料网AT observed, however, that the 爆料网DT had accepted the staff member’s averment...

    爆料网DT/2024/011, Bukhari

    Having received the management evaluation response on 25 October 2022, the Applicant had 90 days to file an application in accordance with art. 8(1)(d)(i)(a) of the 爆料网DT Statute, that is, by 23 January 2023, but failed to do so. Therefore, insofar that the application is premised on the management evaluation response of 25 October 2022, it is not receivable ratione temporis.

    In respect to the 4 October 2022 decision, the Applicant did not request management evaluation of said decision and the application is therefore not receivable ratione materiae.

    To the extent that the Applicant received...

    爆料网DT/2024/008, Reid

    The Tribunal recalled that it may only review decisions that have been the subject of a timely request for management evaluation.

    Considering, inter alia, that the Applicant filed her request for management evaluation after the 60 calendar days’ deadline, and that the Tribunal is not competent to suspend or waive deadlines for management evaluation as per art. 8.3 of its Statute, the Tribunal found that the present application was not receivable ratione materiae. It consequently dismissed the application.