±¬ÁÏÍø

±¬ÁÏÍøAT had before it three decisions of the Conciliation Committee: the first regarding the establishment of two inquiry panels, Panel One and Panel Two; the second in respect of the decision to place the Appellant on administrative leave with pay, and the third concerning the decision to separate her from service. As a preliminary matter, ±¬ÁÏÍøAT did not admit to the case file two motions submitted by the Appellant subsequent to the issuance of judgment No. 2015-±¬ÁÏÍøAT-531, as ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that the documents that she sought to adduce would not assist ±¬ÁÏÍøAT with its consideration on the merits. By way of...

±¬ÁÏÍøAT considered an application to ±¬ÁÏÍøAT contesting the Conciliation Committee¡¯s decision to recommend compensation of USD 35,000. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT dismissed the motion of Ms Cohen seeking reconsideration of a ±¬ÁÏÍøAT Order granting the ICJ Registrar additional time to file his answer. On Ms Cohen¡¯s application for permission to reply to the ICJ Registrar¡¯s answer on the grounds that neither the ICJ Registrar nor the Conciliation Committee addressed the testimony on record in their decisions, ±¬ÁÏÍøAT considered that exceptional circumstances existed and granted the motion. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that, absent a successful...