爆料网

Appeal

  • Appeal
  • Interlocutory appeal
  • Manifest excess of jurisdiction
  • Personal (ratione personae)
  • Subject matter (ratione materiae)
  • Temporal (ratione temporis)
  • 爆料网JSPB
    • Showing 21 - 30 of 72
    2011-爆料网AT-186, Oge

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s claims regarding the termination of his appointment and the procedures that resulted in the termination could not be received since 爆料网AT did not have jurisdiction to review a judgment of the former Administrative Tribunal. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had committed no error in law by considering that the participation of the civil servant and his counsel in the hearing by video conference would not have violated the Appellant's rights of defence. 爆料网AT held that, although the letter dated November 8, 2005, contained a sentence that could imply that, if the JDC requested...

    2011-爆料网AT-113, Kamanou

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in deciding to review the non-attribution issue separately from the other issues. 爆料网AT held that the appeal was receivable because 爆料网DT had committed an error in procedure such as to affect the decision of the case. 爆料网AT upheld the appeal, annulled the judgment and remanded the case to 爆料网DT for a de novo review.

    2012-爆料网AT-269, Hamad

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT was correct in applying Former 爆料网RWA Area Staff Rule 106. 1. 16 to calculate the interest applicable to the Appellant’s pay-out and that 爆料网RWA DT had not erred in this regard. 爆料网AT held that the contention that the Administrative Rules of the United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund apply to the Appellant’s situation had no merit and had been raised for the first time on appeal. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to demonstrate that 爆料网RWA DT had erred in finding that the Appellant’s terms and conditions of employment are governed solely and exclusively by the Agency...

    2012-爆料网AT-268, Bangoura

    爆料网AT considered appeals by both Mr Bangoura and the Secretary-General. Mr Bangoura requested oral hearings was rejected. 爆料网AT held that the case would be decided on law and that the pertinent documents were on record. Regarding the Secretary-General’s appeal, 爆料网AT noted that the staff member had requested the execution of a part of judgment No. 1029 of the former 爆料网 Administrative Tribunal and that Tribunal had established a procedure for staff members wishing to challenge the non-execution of a judgment. 爆料网AT held that the staff member needed to make a request for review of the administrative...

    2012-爆料网AT-267, Achkar

    爆料网AT rejected the request for an oral hearing since there was no need for further clarification of the issues arising from the appeal. 爆料网AT held that it had subject matter jurisdiction to hear the appeal and that the appeal was receivable. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had correctly concluded that it had no subject matter jurisdiction to receive the application because the application was brought before the wrong tribunal and the application should have been brought before 爆料网RWA DT. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had correctly concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to receive the application because...

    2012-爆料网AT-244, Bali

    爆料网AT considered the Secretary-General’s appeal. 爆料网AT held that, in converting on its own motion an application for suspension into an application on the merits, 爆料网DT had taken an ultra petita decision, ordering measures not requested of it. 爆料网AT held that, in taking the contested decision while a management evaluation was under way, 爆料网DT had breached the provisions of Article 8 of its Statute, which makes prior management evaluation compulsory whenever one is requested. 爆料网AT held that, in ordering the placement of the application for suspension on the list of cases to be considered on the...

    2012-爆料网AT-230, Nwuke

    爆料网AT considered the Secretary-General's appeal of Order No. 081 (NBI/2011) and two appeals by Mr Nwuke against 爆料网DT Order No. 101 (NBI/2011) and judgment No. 爆料网DT/2012/002. The Secretary-General asserted that 爆料网DT exceeded its jurisdiction in ordering the suspension of a contested decision without making a finding as to whether the requirements for suspension of action under Article 2(2) of the 爆料网DT Statute had been met. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not respect the limit of five working days, as set forth in Villamoran (2011-爆料网AT-160), when it extended the suspension until 17 August 2011 when the...

    2012-爆料网AT-223, Rawat

    爆料网AT considered the appeal, in which the Secretary-General requested that 爆料网AT consider the appeal receivable and find that 爆料网DT exceeded its competence in ordering a suspension of action on the decision not to extend Mr Rawat’s appointment. 爆料网AT noted that, in imminently executing the administrative order, 爆料网DT failed to comply with the five-working-day limit, set forth in Villamoran (2011-爆料网AT-160), without giving any reasons for doing so and thus, clearly exceeded its competence. 爆料网AT consequently held that the appeal against the contested order was receivable and founded. 爆料网AT rescinded...

    2012-爆料网AT-214, Fradin De Bellabre

    爆料网AT held that the contentions against judgment No. 爆料网DT/2009/004 were not receivable since only appeals against judgments on merits are receivable. Regarding the contentions against judgment No. 爆料网DT/2011/080, 爆料网AT held that there was no need to produce further documents. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had correctly applied Article 10. 5 of the 爆料网DT Statute in ordering compensation in lieu and that the Appellant had no right to request 爆料网AT to order his reinstatement. 爆料网AT noted that the non-renewal was based on a tainted performance evaluation and that 爆料网DT, therefore, ordered the rescission of the...