爆料网

Administrative decision

  • Décision administrative implicite
  • Décision administrative implicite
  • Décision administrative implicite
  • Décision administrative implicite
  • Décision administrative implicite
  • Décision administrative implicite
  • Décision administrative implicite
  • Definition
  • 顿é蹿颈苍颈迟颈辞苍
  • Definition
  • 顿é蹿颈苍颈迟颈辞苍
  • 顿é蹿颈苍颈迟颈辞苍
  • Definition
  • Definition
  • Definition
  • 顿é蹿颈苍颈迟颈辞苍
  • Implied administrative decision
  • Motifs
  • Notification
  • Reasons
    • Showing 141 - 150 of 432
    2019-爆料网AT-927, Jafari

    爆料网AT agreed with 爆料网RWA DT that the legal framework did not establish an automatic right of the staff member to the extension of his or her service beyond the age of retirement upon the submission of the pertinent application, even if she or he satisfied those two conditions. However, 爆料网AT held that, contrary to 爆料网RWA DT’s finding, the Administration has the discretion to deny a request to extend a staff member’s service beyond retirement only in exceptional cases and on account of the interests of 爆料网RWA, which must be reflected clearly and precisely in the reasoning for the decision. 爆料网AT held...

    2010-爆料网AT-078, Zhang

    爆料网AT noted that, even though it found the case non-receivable, 爆料网DT undertook a final review of the Appellant’s allegations and that the case failed on the facts. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err in finding that the decisions contested in the application, namely that the matters contested did not constitute administrative decisions and therefore her application was not receivable. 爆料网AT held there was no basis to disagree with 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal.

    2010-爆料网AT-099, Nwuke

    爆料网AT held that the investigation into the management and administrative practices in general or of disciplinary cases is usually a matter within the discretion of the Administration but may still be subject to judicial review. 爆料网AT noted that if a staff member is dissatisfied with the outcome of an administrative decision, they may request judicial review which may result in the affirmation or recission of the decision. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in finding the application not receivable, as the Appellant challenged an administrative decision, claiming non-compliance with the terms of his...

    2010-爆料网AT-058, Andati-Amwayi

    爆料网AT considered whether the impugned decision was a contestable administrative decision. 爆料网AT noted that what constitutes an administrative decision will depend on the nature of the decision, the legal framework under which the decision was made, and the consequences of the decision. 爆料网AT held that the requirement for 爆料网 Office at Nairobi (爆料网ON) staff members to possess MIP cards or a Grounds Pass in order to access medical services on credit was for the overall effective administration of the Organisation’s staff medical insurance plan. 爆料网AT held that this requirement was of general...

    2010-爆料网AT-049, Planas

    爆料网AT held that an introductory argument concerning the content of the other party's observations or aspects of administrative conduct that was not raised at the first instance is largely inadmissible. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct in finding that, as the Appellant did not contest in precise terms her non-selection for any post, she did not identify any administrative decision in her application. 爆料网AT noted that the Appellant had at no time requested management evaluation, or sought administrative review as required under the former internal justice system. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and...

    2011-爆料网AT-177, Tabari

    On the issue of receivability, 爆料网AT noted that not taking a decision was also a decision. 爆料网AT noted that the alleged discrimination was based on a comparison between the claimant and staff members of a different category, namely international staff members. 爆料网AT held that the general principle of equal pay for equal work does not prevent a legislative body or the Administration from establishing different treatments for different categories of workers or staff members if the distinction is made on the basis of lawful goals. 爆料网AT held that there was no discrimination when the non-payment of...

    2012-爆料网AT-273, Rosana

    爆料网AT held that that 爆料网DT had correctly established that the silence of the 爆料网EP management constituted an implied administrative decision and that this decision was taken on 31 August 2009. 爆料网AT held the Appellant’s request for management evaluation was time-barred and that the application was, therefore, not receivable. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.

    2012-爆料网AT-269, Hamad

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT was correct in applying Former 爆料网RWA Area Staff Rule 106. 1. 16 to calculate the interest applicable to the Appellant’s pay-out and that 爆料网RWA DT had not erred in this regard. 爆料网AT held that the contention that the Administrative Rules of the United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund apply to the Appellant’s situation had no merit and had been raised for the first time on appeal. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to demonstrate that 爆料网RWA DT had erred in finding that the Appellant’s terms and conditions of employment are governed solely and exclusively by the Agency...

    2012-爆料网AT-260, Rahman

    爆料网AT held that it was not in dispute that the Appellant did not submit a request for management evaluation until more than one year after he had been notified that he had not been selected for the post in question. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT, under Article 11.1 of the 爆料网DT Statute, was obliged to issue a judgment in writing, stating the reasons, facts, and law on which it was based. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT’s decisions, that the Appellant had been properly served with a notification in writing in compliance with former Staff Rule 111.2 and that Article 8.3 prohibited 爆料网DT from extending the deadline for...